Patent-filed live-call supplement drafting

Roofing Supplement Software

Roofing Supplement Software That Writes the Supplement During the Adjuster Call

Contractorfy listens to the adjuster call, compares what the adjuster approved to what the roof actually needs, and generates the supplement estimate, invoice, or report — routed to the adjuster before the call ends.

Built by a roofer who filed a patent on communication-driven document generation, cross-document correlation, and RCV/ACV financial intelligence.

Run supplement workflowsStart professional trial
Supplement estimate, supplement invoice, and supplement report all generated from the actual adjuster conversation — no re-drafting after the call.
Missing line-item detection compares the approved claim to measurement-driven scope and flags every skipped item automatically.
RCV, ACV, depreciation, and deductible tracking run in the background — your supplement is financially defensible before you hit send.

Signal board

Operational proof in one view

live

Document set

supplement estimate, invoice, report, scope letter, demand letter

Correlation

patent-filed missing-item detection

Financial engine

RCV / ACV / depreciation / deductible live

Delivery

sent to adjuster before hang-up

Workflow preview

1

Take the adjuster call

Normal reinspection or scope conversation — no scripts, no buttons.

2

Live transcript + claim compare

Contractorfy pulls the approved estimate and compares it to the measured scope live.

3

Supplement drafted

Supplement estimate, invoice, or report — code-aware, price-library-aligned, and ready to send.

Why this page exists

Stop writing supplements after the adjuster call. The supplement is already built by the time you hang up.

Best-fit use case

Contractorfy listens to the adjuster call, compares what the adjuster approved to what the roof actually needs, and generates the supplement estimate, invoice, or report — routed to the adjuster before the call ends.

  • Supplement estimate, supplement invoice, and supplement report all generated from the actual adjuster conversation — no re-drafting after the call.
  • Missing line-item detection compares the approved claim to measurement-driven scope and flags every skipped item automatically.
  • RCV, ACV, depreciation, and deductible tracking run in the background — your supplement is financially defensible before you hit send.

Document excerpts

Production-ready document templates for internal review and client-facing rollout:

Supplement cover letter template (sample)

Supplement draft

Re: Maple Street Residential Roofing Claim - Additional Payment Request

Policyholder: Alex Harper
Loss date: 01-Mar-2026
Insurer: North Metro Mutual

Requested add-backs:

  • Replace all damaged ridge caps where impact scoring exceeds 40% of original condition.
  • Repair and re-seal ice & water barrier at all eave transitions.
  • Reinstate flashing and underlayment at all new penetrations from wind-driven debris damage.

Code reference: IRC R905.2.8 requires drainage protection at edges and flashing where exposed.

Attached: measurement report, photo sequence, loss map, and claim line history.

Live-call supplement drafting

While the adjuster is on the phone, Contractorfy is building the supplement that answers their scope.

  • Supplement estimate (billing-ready line items)
  • Supplement invoice (formatted for carrier payment)
  • Supplement report (narrative + totals)
  • Scope letter + demand letter if denial escalation is needed

Missing line-item engine

Patent-filed correlation between approved claim and field-measured scope.

  • Compares approved estimate to EagleView / Hover / GAF geometry
  • Flags every item the adjuster skipped (ridge, starter, flashing, ice-and-water, code-upgrade)
  • Writes each missing item as a defensible supplement line

Financial intelligence built in

The supplement is financially correct before it leaves your hand.

  • RCV, ACV, depreciation recoverable vs. non-recoverable
  • Deductible and carrier-specific math
  • Prior payments reconciled across original claim + prior supplements

Frequently asked questions

Are code citations optional?

You can include them where appropriate based on claim and jurisdiction context.

Can adjusters use outputs directly?

Yes, outputs remain clear and job-tied for easier external review.

Can this reduce denied items?

Many teams reduce back-and-forth by improving initial submission quality.

Can we keep internal templates?

Yes, internal language preferences can be preserved within approved workflows.

Can we automate this completely?

Automation is supported, with human review for risky items.